For this blog post, I decided to focus on the use of
interactivity in education. Interactivity might mean a lot of things, but in
this instance, I’m considering interactive textbooks. While students have the
ability to read a textbook page like normal on their computer, there are more
options to present the information in multimodal ways. For instance, in a
history book, one might be reading about a recent event in history. In an
interactive textbook, alongside the text, a student could click on a link, and
be shown a video or image gallery related to the event to enhance the learning
experience.
I do have a fair bit of knowledge about the textbooks used
at our school. Presently, I am responsible for ordering textbooks for all of
the students, and have some insight in to what the teachers choose to use in
their classes. Some teachers choose to use interactive online textbooks, some
choose e-PDF style textbooks with no interactivity, and some prefer the
physical texts in the classroom. I have not noticed any correlation between
which grade levels prefer interactive media over non-interactive.
I can see the argument from both points on view. In looking
at middle school students (grades 6 through 8), I would imagine that the
interactivity would keep students interested in the topic at hand in a way that’s
appropriate to their younger age. However, I can also see times when
interactivity might be too distracting from getting the point of the day’s
lesson across. Meanwhile, in looking at the older students in high school, they
can likely focus better on non-interactive textbooks than the younger students,
but they may also still benefit from the interactive technology.
Pearson, which is one of the publishers that we use,
introduced their interactive textbooks in a 2012 video, showing some of the
capabilities and benefits. Even since this video was released three years ago,
technology has progressed so much, and interactive textbooks are capable of so
much more. Looking ahead, it’s hard to even imagine how interactive technology
might progress, but we know it’s only going to get more advanced.
Interactivity aside for just a moment, I think one of the
biggest benefits of a digital textbook environment is not having to carry
massive textbooks around everywhere. When I was in high school, and digital
textbooks weren’t a mainstream idea just yet, I remember having so many heavy
books, and homework in all of them, that I had to prioritize what assignments
to do that night because I literally couldn’t fit everything in my backpack.
With everything on one device, and with how small these devices can be now,
students can have everything they need on just an iPad or laptop, no heavy
books needed. That benefit in itself is huge.
In my research on interactivity, I found a great relevant
article, entitled “From classic math school books to interactive gamified eLearning”
(Butean, Morar, Modoveanu, & Alexandru, 2015). The article examines possible
options for eLearning, and gives student and teacher perspectives on those
options. The authors of the article acknowledge that modern mobile technology
is very popular among children: “Regarding tablets, the number of children who are using this
devices are going up every year by at least 20%. This evolution also reflects
the changes in how younger people browse the internet or use online services
and apps” (p. 147).
To me, these
numbers aren’t surprising. I see so many children, everywhere I go, with a
tablet in their hands to keep them occupied and entertained. Younger children
have grown up being immersed in technology everywhere they go, so it’s only
natural that more and more children are using these technologies, and seemingly
at a younger age every year. It makes sense that this massive availability of
technology translates to students using more technology in the classroom in the
younger years.
Interactivity
in textbooks can definitely be a good thing. However, there are plenty of
researchers who oppose the use of digital textbooks. This Huffington Post article links to nine studies that show why print books are seen as better than ebooks. There is certainly a lot of debate out there on what method is better for
students. This is just one of the things I hope to learn in my ethnography—in my
school specifically, which type of textbooks work best for the students’ needs?
Me
personally? I prefer print textbooks. In my graduate program, every semester I
purchased the print copies of every single textbook. If I have to read some
sort of article, I’ll print it out so I can read it and highlight on it, and
annotate it if need be. I have a library of books that take of bookshelves
instead of gigabytes. It’s just always been my preference. I’ve tried to use e-readers
before, but I just can’t focus on them.
When
students are forced to use digital technologies in the classroom, what if they
don’t learn best that way? I imagine myself in the same situation if I were to
be back in a traditional classroom. If I were required to use an electronic
textbook, but I learn better using a print book, what would my options be? What
if I can’t use a physical textbook and my success is affected? Many of our students
may be in this same situation, which my ethnography might help to reveal.
References:
Butean, A., Morar, A., Moldoveanu, A., & Alexandru, M. (2015, April 23-24). From classic math school books to interactive gamified eLearning. Paper presented at The 11th International Scientific Conference eLearning and Software for Eduation, Bucharest. doi:10.12753/2066-026X-15-022
References:
Butean, A., Morar, A., Moldoveanu, A., & Alexandru, M. (2015, April 23-24). From classic math school books to interactive gamified eLearning. Paper presented at The 11th International Scientific Conference eLearning and Software for Eduation, Bucharest. doi:10.12753/2066-026X-15-022

No comments:
Post a Comment